Research integrity
Research questions, evidence, analysis, limitations, and claims should be presented accurately and without overstating what a study establishes.
Research Governance
IFAS aims to conduct research in a way that supports technical scrutiny, reproducibility, and responsible publication.
Research questions, evidence, analysis, limitations, and claims should be presented accurately and without overstating what a study establishes.
Research questions, methods, measures, and material protocol changes should be documented so that the development of a study can be examined.
Relevant financial, institutional, or personal interests should be identified and managed when they could affect research decisions or publication.
Publication decisions should balance technical transparency with the risks of releasing safety-sensitive information.
Research data and records should be handled with appropriate attention to quality, access, security, retention, and documentation.
Where research involves people, the study design should address informed participation, privacy, potential harms, and appropriate review requirements.
Safety-sensitive findings should be assessed for potential misuse and, where appropriate, shared first with affected parties through a responsible disclosure process.
Methods, model and framework versions, evaluation conditions, and analysis decisions should be recorded to support replication where practicable.
Negative or null findings should be considered for publication where they provide useful evidence and can be communicated responsibly.